MUD-Dev
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [MUD-Dev] OT: Linux g++
[Greg Munt:]
:I have heard that EGCS (www.cygnus.com/egcs) is much better than g++,
:though I haven't had a chance to use it yet. Also, having (just now)
:looked at the FSF web site, I have found that gcc is now on version 2.8; I
:have 2.7.2. Does anyone know what/if improvements were made to the
:compiler's handling of the 3 C++ features specified above? Let's hope my
:comments don't still apply.
A friend of mine who uses g++ on Linux recently upgraded to 2.8. He says
it is the first version to even compile all of his programs. So, based
on that small sample, it seems to be a signficant improvement.
--
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA
- Thread context:
- Re: [MUD-Dev] 3D graphics (Was: The impact of the web on muds), (continued)
- Re: [MUD-Dev] META: OS wars,
Mike Sellers mike#online-alchemy,com, Fri 13 Feb 1998, 22:39 GMT
- META: OS wars,
coder coder#ibm,net, Fri 13 Feb 1998, 19:59 GMT
- Re: [MUD-Dev] OT: Linux g++,
Chris Gray cg#ami-cg,GraySage.Edmonton.AB.CA, Fri 13 Feb 1998, 01:43 GMT
- user-centered design (was Re: [MUD-Dev] Clients),
Mike Sellers mike#online-alchemy,com, Thu 12 Feb 1998, 16:40 GMT
- RE: [MUD-Dev] Clients,
Koster, Raph rkoster#origin,ea.com, Thu 12 Feb 1998, 15:12 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]