08 Jun, 2010, Davion wrote in the 21st comment:
Votes: 0
Cratylus said:
Was I banned for my statements over the course of months?

Yes
Quote
Or was I banned for the statements Kiasyn cited?


And yes. Call it the clincher.
08 Jun, 2010, Cratylus wrote in the 22nd comment:
Votes: 0
Davion said:
Cratylus said:
Was I banned for my statements over the course of months?

Yes
Quote
Or was I banned for the statements Kiasyn cited?


And yes. Call it the clincher.


Then I'm not sure I see much difference between this and Rule 14. Rule 14
was a pretext for Samson to ban me in accordance to a new rule, but based
mostly on his personal enmity.

This is pretty much the same deal.

Remember the part in Return of the Jedi when Vader taunts Luke about his sister,
sayin "Obi Wan was wise to hide her from me. Perhaps if you won't join me…she will!"

And Luke's like

NEVERRRR!

And whales on Vader beating him like an animal, no finesse, no thinking, just sheer
hatred and violence and WHAM WHAM WHAM finally he chops off Vader's robotic hand…

then looks down to look at his own hand, which in the previous movie had been
amputated in combat and was now also mechanical.

Samson's still fired as admin, right?

-Crat
http://lpmuds.net
08 Jun, 2010, Davion wrote in the 23rd comment:
Votes: 0
Constant abuse on IMC has never been tolerated.
08 Jun, 2010, Cratylus wrote in the 24th comment:
Votes: 0
Davion said:
Constant abuse on IMC has never been tolerated.


Well that doesn't really make sense, does it. On the one hand you accuse me of
abusing you for months, on the other you claim that's not tolerated.

And my point stands. You've struck down Samson only to take his place with your own Rule 14.

-Crat
http://lpmuds.net
08 Jun, 2010, Davion wrote in the 25th comment:
Votes: 0
Cratylus said:
Davion said:
Constant abuse on IMC has never been tolerated.


Well that doesn't really make sense, does it. On the one hand you accuse me of
abusing you for months, on the other you claim that's not tolerated.

And my point stands. You've struck down Samson only to take his place with your own Rule 14.

-Crat
http://lpmuds.net



It's not being tolerated… that's why you're banned.
08 Jun, 2010, Cratylus wrote in the 26th comment:
Votes: 0
Davion said:
It's not being tolerated… that's why you're banned.


Think it through.

Davion said:
Constant abuse on IMC has never been tolerated.


Davion said:
Yes, we will take months of abuse before we actually do anything!


Ok?

-Crat
http://lpmuds.net
08 Jun, 2010, Davion wrote in the 27th comment:
Votes: 0
Thought about it. And your constant abuse isn't being tolerated and you are banned. Might be permanent considering you circumvented the ban a few times. There was just enough rope there to hang yourself.
08 Jun, 2010, Cratylus wrote in the 28th comment:
Votes: 0
Davion said:
Thought about it. And your constant abuse isn't being tolerated and you are banned. Might be permanent considering you circumvented the ban a few times. There was just enough rope there to hang yourself.


If you mean Kiasyn letting me talk on ifree, you should take it up with him.

-Crat
http://lpmuds.net/diamond_what_will_happ...
08 Jun, 2010, Davion wrote in the 29th comment:
Votes: 0
Not ifree.
08 Jun, 2010, Katiara wrote in the 30th comment:
Votes: 0
This is exactly why I am outraged over this whole situation.

1. You update IMC2 Rules and change unwarranted hostility towards newbies to just unwarranted hostility - This is fine and great.
2. Within hours, you ban a user and quote him this changed rule as a reason for the ban but don't warn - The ban itself would have been fine had the rules been in place longer OR you followed your own procedures and warned him. Instead you allowed your emotions to take control and ban him and use the recently changed rule when in reality it is because Crat now is able to get so under your skin you have lost all objective ability.
3. After the 3 day mark, yes it has come and gone, you state he was now banned for months of abuse. - First of all, stay consistent! Once again, emotions are in play here, no real admin authority.
4. He is still banned and now you have displayed more "unwarranted hostility" toward Crat than I have seen anyone else display in the past three days. Honestly, do your job right or give it to someone that can. I am sorry you can't control your temper but if you want to admin here without people pointing out how you are failing, try harder.
08 Jun, 2010, Cratylus wrote in the 31st comment:
Votes: 0
Davion said:
Not ifree.


Then I don't know what you're talking about. Did someone use ichat claiming to be me?

Please clarify.

-Crat
http://lpmuds.net
08 Jun, 2010, Davion wrote in the 32nd comment:
Votes: 0
I checked the logs for icode, and you had spoken in there during the course of your ban.
08 Jun, 2010, Kayle wrote in the 33rd comment:
Votes: 0
And it's his fault the ban didn't keep him from talking on that channel?
08 Jun, 2010, Davion wrote in the 34th comment:
Votes: 0
He was testing his limits. I get that. But this time he touched an electric fence.
08 Jun, 2010, Ix wrote in the 35th comment:
Votes: 0
Davion said:
He was testing his limits. I get that. But this time he touched an electric fence.

But he didn't get electrocuted, he got bit by a snake in the grass. Your analogue doesn't really hold up.
08 Jun, 2010, Kayle wrote in the 36th comment:
Votes: 0
No, You're just being a douche.

I would have tested to make sure the ban stuck to all channels. You should thank him. He showed you that your ban changes missed a channel. He didn't break any rules when he did it. It was you guys that did it anyway. You changed the way the ban code worked without verifying that it worked without flaw. So now you're going to ban him over KiaCode? Way to go.
08 Jun, 2010, Katiara wrote in the 37th comment:
Votes: 0
He really isn't his fault the ADMINS don't do their job and give him terms of the ban.
08 Jun, 2010, Davion wrote in the 38th comment:
Votes: 0
Kayle said:
No, You're just being a douche.

I would have tested to make sure the ban stuck to all channels. You should thank him. He showed you that your ban changes missed a channel. He didn't break any rules when he did it. It was you guys that did it anyway. You changed the way the ban code worked without verifying that it worked without flaw. So now you're going to ban him over KiaCode? Way to go.


Just enough rope to hang himself ;)
08 Jun, 2010, Asylumius wrote in the 39th comment:
Votes: 0
This is like speed chess.
08 Jun, 2010, Katiara wrote in the 40th comment:
Votes: 0
I could the say the same about you Davion.
20.0/122