24 Mar, 2009, Cratylus wrote in the 81st comment:
Votes: 0
kiasyn said:
neither atm, im too lazy / overworked.


Ok…which will be supported then?

Do folks have a preference?

-Crat
http://lpmuds.net
24 Mar, 2009, Scandum wrote in the 82nd comment:
Votes: 0
key\tvalue\tvalue is pretty much what the telnet version does, except that \t is \002, so if that's kept the same a crawler should be able to use the same code with two interfaces.
24 Mar, 2009, David Haley wrote in the 83rd comment:
Votes: 0
I don't see the need for two separators; might as well use \t to separate everything, and say that the first element must be the field name.

(Actually, a crawler would use the same code with just one interface, with the separator parametrized…)
24 Mar, 2009, Cratylus wrote in the 84th comment:
Votes: 0
David Haley said:
I don't see the need for two separators; might as well use \t to separate everything, and say that the first element must be the field name.


I'm leaning toward this as well…I think it just makes sense. Just wanted to get some more
opinions before changing it. IIRC Zeno is doing the Smaug plaintext stuff…right? Whoever
is doing it, are you cool with \t?

-Crat
http://lpmuds.net

PS asking here because it's getting old having to chase this topic over 3 forums

EDIT: my bad, four forums
80.0/84