15 Jun, 2009, Dubstack wrote in the 1st comment:
Votes: 0
dbx.tar.gz
dbx1a.tar.gz
dbx2.gz
15 Jun, 2009, tphegley wrote in the 2nd comment:
Votes: 0
Dude, seriously.


Take your sig off.
15 Jun, 2009, Runter wrote in the 3rd comment:
Votes: 0
Yeah, rofl. I didn't know you could have one that big.
15 Jun, 2009, tphegley wrote in the 4th comment:
Votes: 0
This kids….is why dbz muds have to have billions of numbers.

Everything HAS to be over the top.
15 Jun, 2009, Dubstack wrote in the 5th comment:
Votes: 0
sorry it is a little to big lol but can one of you answer my question?
15 Jun, 2009, Cratylus wrote in the 6th comment:
Votes: 0
cool sig, bro.

don't let the h8rs get you down

-Crat
15 Jun, 2009, Dubstack wrote in the 7th comment:
Votes: 0
I took it off but I like the cat lol
15 Jun, 2009, Runter wrote in the 8th comment:
Votes: 0
tphegley said:
This kids….is why dbz muds have to have billions of numbers.

Everything HAS to be over the top.


Let's stop the discriminating DBZ bashing. DBGT was Wayyyy worse. ;)
15 Jun, 2009, David Haley wrote in the 9th comment:
Votes: 0
You probably won't get a helpful answer until your sig image is counted in pixels, not hundreds of pixels… better yet, don't have one at all…
15 Jun, 2009, tphegley wrote in the 10th comment:
Votes: 0
haha. The new is a little smaller, still big.

Crats sig is pretty funny though. Made me laugh.


To answer your question. Just different ways to put a bunch of files into one file. The first two examples are same type of file but just different name.
15 Jun, 2009, Dubstack wrote in the 11th comment:
Votes: 0
why would you hate me for having one I just want a answer you didn't have post a comment man that was the jerk thing to do
15 Jun, 2009, Dubstack wrote in the 12th comment:
Votes: 0
Thank you tphegley
15 Jun, 2009, tphegley wrote in the 13th comment:
Votes: 0
No one hates you for having one, but the fact remains that you had like a 600 x 800 sig that screwed everything up in the post. Programmers are creatures of habit! The littlest thing that messes with what they are used to sets them off.

No one is 'hatin' here. Once we get past the sig issues we'll be fine. :)
15 Jun, 2009, David Haley wrote in the 14th comment:
Votes: 0
Others might say that the "jerk thing to do" is to have an obnoxious sig image. :tongue:
15 Jun, 2009, Dubstack wrote in the 15th comment:
Votes: 0
david is mine sig fine now?
15 Jun, 2009, Dean wrote in the 16th comment:
Votes: 0
Your sig is horrible.
15 Jun, 2009, David Haley wrote in the 17th comment:
Votes: 0
IMO no, because it's still huge, although not screenful-huge. A sig should be small and relatively discreet, like a few lines of text. Your sig is kind of the visual equivalent of blaring loud music through my speakers. :thinking: (Whereas previously, you were shaking the whole neighborhood… :wink:)
15 Jun, 2009, Dubstack wrote in the 18th comment:
Votes: 0
You can hear be for you see me I got king kong in the trunk!
15 Jun, 2009, Dean wrote in the 19th comment:
Votes: 0
Dubstack said:
You can hear be for you see me I got king kong in the trunk!


I'm not going to lie, I have no idea what you've just said.
15 Jun, 2009, Dubstack wrote in the 20th comment:
Votes: 0
its a rap song king kongs are speakers for playing heavy bass
0.0/43