1998Q1/
<!-- MHonArc v2.4.4 -->
<!--X-Subject: Re: [MUD&#45;Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP) -->
<!--X-From-R13: Xba Zrbaneq <wyrbaneqNqvipbz.hzbc&#45;nc.pbz> -->
<!--X-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 19:22:28 +0000 -->
<!--X-Message-Id: 19980317111840.55762#divcom,umop&#45;ap.com -->
<!--X-Content-Type: text/plain -->
<!--X-Reference: Pine.LNX.3.96.980316230342.719A&#45;100000#shamen,cyberhighway.net -->
<!--X-Reference: Pine.SOL.3.96.980317193359.8501A&#45;100000#licia,dtek.chalmers.se -->
<!--X-Head-End-->
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>MUD-Dev message, Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</title>
<!-- meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow" -->
<link rev="made" href="mailto:jleonard#divcom,umop-ap.com">
</head>
<body background="/backgrounds/paperback.gif" bgcolor="#ffffff"
      text="#000000" link="#0000FF" alink="#FF0000" vlink="#006000">

  <font size="+4" color="#804040">
    <strong><em>MUD-Dev<br>mailing list archive</em></strong>
  </font>
      
<br>
[&nbsp;<a href="../">Other Periods</a>
&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="../../">Other mailing lists</a>
&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="/search.php3">Search</a>
&nbsp;]
<br clear=all><hr>
<!--X-Body-Begin-->
<!--X-User-Header-->
<!--X-User-Header-End-->
<!--X-TopPNI-->

Date:&nbsp;
[&nbsp;<a href="msg00738.html">Previous</a>
&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="msg00741.html">Next</a>
&nbsp;]
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Thread:&nbsp;
[&nbsp;<a href="msg00737.html">Previous</a>
&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="msg00745.html">Next</a>
&nbsp;]
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Index:&nbsp;
[&nbsp;<A HREF="author.html#00739">Author</A>
&nbsp;|&nbsp;<A HREF="#00739">Date</A>
&nbsp;|&nbsp;<A HREF="thread.html#00739">Thread</A>
&nbsp;]

<!--X-TopPNI-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-->
<!--X-Subject-Header-Begin-->
<H1>Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</H1>
<HR>
<!--X-Subject-Header-End-->
<!--X-Head-of-Message-->
<UL>
<LI><em>To</em>: <A HREF="mailto:mud-dev#null,net">mud-dev#null,net</A></LI>
<LI><em>Subject</em>: Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</LI>
<LI><em>From</em>: Jon Leonard &lt;<A HREF="mailto:jleonard#divcom,umop-ap.com">jleonard#divcom,umop-ap.com</A>&gt;</LI>
<LI><em>Date</em>: Tue, 17 Mar 1998 11:18:40 -0800</LI>
<LI><em>Cc</em>: Jon Leonard &lt;<A HREF="mailto:jleonard#divcom,umop-ap.com">jleonard#divcom,umop-ap.com</A>&gt;</LI>
</UL>
<!--X-Head-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-Begin-->
<HR>
<!--X-Head-Body-Sep-End-->
<!--X-Body-of-Message-->
<PRE>
On Tue, Mar 17, 1998 at 10:58:58AM +0000, Niklas Elmqvist wrote:
&gt; On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Ben Greear wrote:
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; I'm pondering a multi level transport stream.  The important stuff
&gt; &gt; would go over tcp/ip, and the client-side-cache updates would run
&gt; &gt; over UDP.
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; The question is, what is the packet size (max) that UDP can handle?
&gt; 
&gt; A good place to find information about anything that even remotely
&gt; pertains to networks and the Internet are the RFC docs. A bit technical
&gt; (but that's how we like them) but usually of good standard. You can find a
&gt; directory containing ASCII-text versions of all the RFCs at
&gt; &lt;URL:<A  HREF="http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Internet-documents/rfc/">http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Internet-documents/rfc/</A>&gt; (the index is called
&gt; rfc-index.txt).
&gt; 
&gt; RFC 1180 is a TCP/IP tutorial, and a good one at that, but only brushes
&gt; through UDP. RFC 768 concerns itself solely with UDP, the answer to your
&gt; question might be found there.

It's likely more complicated than that.  The maximum size of a UDP packet
is about the maximum size of an IP datagram (quite large).  Realisticly,
though, you want largest packet that won't get broken up into fragments.

The largest non-fragmenting packet (MTU = Maximum Transfer Unit) depends
on the networks involved.  For Ethernet, it's about 1500 bytes.  Most high
speed networks have larger maxima, but you could see almost anything.

A search for "MTU discovery" should probably find something on how some
TCP implementations figure out what the optimal packet size is.  Anyone
seriously considering a UDP tranport protocol should write something similar.
The basic idea is set the "don't fragment" bit, and play with packet size
until you find out what works.

Jon Leonard

</PRE>

<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<HR>
<ul compact><li><strong>Follow-Ups</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><A NAME="00745" HREF="msg00745.html">Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></strong>
<ul compact><li><em>From:</em> Ben Greear &lt;greear#cyberhighway,net&gt;</li></ul>
</UL></LI></UL>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<UL><LI><STRONG>References</STRONG>:
<UL>
<LI><STRONG><A NAME="00733" HREF="msg00733.html">Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></STRONG>
<UL><LI><EM>From:</EM> Ben Greear &lt;greear#cyberhighway,net&gt;</LI></UL></LI>
<LI><STRONG><A NAME="00737" HREF="msg00737.html">Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></STRONG>
<UL><LI><EM>From:</EM> Niklas Elmqvist &lt;d97elm#dtek,chalmers.se&gt;</LI></UL></LI>
</UL></LI></UL>
<!--X-References-End-->
<!--X-BotPNI-->
<UL>
<LI>Prev by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00738.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Speaking of Avatars</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by Date:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00741.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] Balancing Addicts</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Prev by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00737.html">Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Next by thread:
<STRONG><A HREF="msg00745.html">Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></STRONG>
</LI>
<LI>Index(es):
<UL>
<LI><A HREF="index.html#00739"><STRONG>Date</STRONG></A></LI>
<LI><A HREF="thread.html#00739"><STRONG>Thread</STRONG></A></LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>

<!--X-BotPNI-End-->
<!--X-User-Footer-->
<!--X-User-Footer-End-->
<ul><li>Thread context:
<BLOCKQUOTE><UL>
<LI><STRONG>Re: [MUD-Dev] XShipWars</STRONG>, <EM>(continued)</EM>
<ul compact>
<ul compact>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00848" HREF="msg00848.html">Re: [MUD-Dev] XShipWars</A></strong>, 
J C Lawrence <a href="mailto:claw#under,engr.sgi.com">claw#under,engr.sgi.com</a>, Mon 23 Mar 1998, 18:48 GMT
</LI>
</ul>
</ul>
</LI>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00735" HREF="msg00735.html">Balancing Addicts</A></strong>, 
Ling <a href="mailto:K.L.Lo-94#student,lboro.ac.uk">K.L.Lo-94#student,lboro.ac.uk</a>, Tue 17 Mar 1998, 14:32 GMT
<LI><strong><A NAME="00733" HREF="msg00733.html">Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></strong>, 
Ben Greear <a href="mailto:greear#cyberhighway,net">greear#cyberhighway,net</a>, Tue 17 Mar 1998, 05:58 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00737" HREF="msg00737.html">Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></strong>, 
Niklas Elmqvist <a href="mailto:d97elm#dtek,chalmers.se">d97elm#dtek,chalmers.se</a>, Tue 17 Mar 1998, 18:41 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00739" HREF="msg00739.html">Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></strong>, 
Jon Leonard <a href="mailto:jleonard#divcom,umop-ap.com">jleonard#divcom,umop-ap.com</a>, Tue 17 Mar 1998, 19:22 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00745" HREF="msg00745.html">Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></strong>, 
Ben Greear <a href="mailto:greear#cyberhighway,net">greear#cyberhighway,net</a>, Wed 18 Mar 1998, 05:05 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00752" HREF="msg00752.html">Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></strong>, 
Jon Leonard <a href="mailto:jleonard#divcom,umop-ap.com">jleonard#divcom,umop-ap.com</a>, Wed 18 Mar 1998, 17:48 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00758" HREF="msg00758.html">Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></strong>, 
Ben Greear <a href="mailto:greear#cyberhighway,net">greear#cyberhighway,net</a>, Thu 19 Mar 1998, 00:52 GMT
<UL>
<LI><strong><A NAME="00763" HREF="msg00763.html">Re: [MUD-Dev]  Transport layer (UDP vs TCP)</A></strong>, 
Niklas Elmqvist <a href="mailto:d97elm#dtek,chalmers.se">d97elm#dtek,chalmers.se</a>, Thu 19 Mar 1998, 08:18 GMT
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL>
</LI>
</UL></BLOCKQUOTE>

</ul>
<hr>
<center>
[&nbsp;<a href="../">Other Periods</a>
&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="../../">Other mailing lists</a>
&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="/search.php3">Search</a>
&nbsp;]
</center>
<hr>
</body>
</html>